<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nighthawking at Rendlesham</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aiad.org.uk/2009/10/14/nighthawking-at-rendlesham/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aiad.org.uk/2009/10/14/nighthawking-at-rendlesham/</link>
	<description>Association of International Antiquities Dealers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:57:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul ratcliffe</title>
		<link>http://aiad.org.uk/2009/10/14/nighthawking-at-rendlesham/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>paul ratcliffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aiad.org.uk/?p=444#comment-119</guid>
		<description>As a metal detectorist myself who does not participate or appreciate night-hawking on any site {scheduled or otherwise}  I feel a good deterrent to night-hawking would be the laying of green waste on sensitive sites. It wouldn&#039;t harm the archaeology of the site as the green waste would be spread over the surface, but anybody detecting where they shouldn&#039;t would find the waste terrible to detect through....imagine trying to be quiet and quick  on a green waste site - it just wouldn&#039;t happen. In the metal detecting fraternity now there is pressure building up on the powers that be to try to stop the spreading of green waste on non-scheduled sites as its definotely the &quot;number 1 enemy&quot; of &#039;tectorists....just an idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a metal detectorist myself who does not participate or appreciate night-hawking on any site {scheduled or otherwise}  I feel a good deterrent to night-hawking would be the laying of green waste on sensitive sites. It wouldn&#8217;t harm the archaeology of the site as the green waste would be spread over the surface, but anybody detecting where they shouldn&#8217;t would find the waste terrible to detect through&#8230;.imagine trying to be quiet and quick  on a green waste site &#8211; it just wouldn&#8217;t happen. In the metal detecting fraternity now there is pressure building up on the powers that be to try to stop the spreading of green waste on non-scheduled sites as its definotely the &#8220;number 1 enemy&#8221; of &#8216;tectorists&#8230;.just an idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

